On the Evanston Family Therapy Center website, Jill Freedman and Gene Combs generously share notes taken from handouts that they have used in their workshops over the years. They include a few pertinent assumptions of the narrative approach, characteristics of the Narrative Worldview, distinctions between structuralism and Post-Structuralism as applied to therapy (Narrative therapy is a post-structuralist therapy), a glimpse at the day-to-day work of narrative therapy, and some questions pertaining to ethics from a narrative perspective.
Please feel free to use them and circulate them, as long as you are careful to credit the source.
Structuralism and Post-Structuralism
(Narrative therapy is a post-structuralist therapy)
– How each approach views identity, personhood, and power
- Seeks to classify individuals in terms of general classes or types.
- Expert knowledge is valued. (Experts have the power to define people’s identities. They know more about people’s personhood than the people themselves.)
- Surface phenomena hold the clues to deep identity. Only expert specialists have the power to accurately decode surface clues.
- Individual lives are interpreted and valued according to rules or norms.
- Experts have the power to assign meaning to people’s life stories by decoding the formulas that underlie their structure.
- Thin conclusions are valued.
- Seeks specific details of people’s identity.
- Local knowledge is valued. (People have the power to define themselves based on their own knowledge of the details of their lives.)
- Surface phenomena are all we can really know. Each of us has the power to interpret surface phenomena.
- Individual lives are valued and interpreted in terms of how they embody exceptions to what might have been expected.
- People have the power to construct meaningful lives through the stories they enact, tell, and remember with one another.
- Thick descriptions are valued.
Michael White’s Workshop Notes
Michael White offered a brief description of distinctions between the Structuralist and post-structuralist approach in his workshop notes:
“The distinction between structuralist and post-structuralist thought is enormously important in understanding narrative work. I have found, however, that it is quite difficult to fully comprehend this difference, since structuralist thinking is such an integral part of our culture and language. In other words, we have constructed many ways of looking at the world and ourselves, and we have become so used to such understandings that we have forgotten that they are constructions. In narrative work, it is very common to deconstruct these understandings. Through such deconstructions, the doorways to new understandings and new options are revealed. …” – Michael White
Click here to read more (as posted by the Pratique Narratives website).